“The Wind in the Rose-Bush” by
Mary Eleanor Wilkins-Freeman is a quick read about a possessed shrubbery (last
seen with the Knights-Who-Say-Nii). It begins with a woman, Rebecca, on a train
headed to collect her niece who has been in the care of her stepmother
following the death of her birth mother (the protagonist’s sister) and father.
Visual Approximation
When Rebecca arrives, the
stepmother greets her and insists the child is away at a friend’s house.
Rebecca agrees to wait, but notices the bush outside seems to rustle even when
there is no wind. The child does not arrive over the next few days, and the
stepmother continues making excuses for her absence. She claims the girl is at
a friend’s house. However, when Rebecca goes to visit the family to retrieve
her niece, she finds the home empty and assumes they’re out of town with the
girl.
Strange things happen at the
stepmother’s house where Rebecca is staying. She hears songs play on the piano
in the dead of night, sees her niece’s shadow under the window, but the girl
never makes it to the door. Strangest of all, Rebecca enters her room one
afternoon to see her niece’s white nightgown laid out on her bed, a single rose
bloom gripped over its chest by the sleeves like a corpse laid to rest. It’s
the same bloom she saw on the rosebush by the front door, but the bloom
disappear when Rebecca tries to confirm this (the convenient disappearance in
any haunting).
Rebecca soon gets a letter,
claiming her cousin has fallen ill and needs immediate care. Rebecca leaves for
home, with the stepmother insisting she will send the niece on a train to
Rebecca’s house as soon as she can. But the girl never comes and the stepmother
breaks all contact with Rebecca. Finally, Rebecca contacts the local postmaster
who informs Rebecca her niece had died a year ago from neglect and the family
her stepmother had claimed she had been visiting had died out long ago.
My only feeling over the course
of this story is how stupid Rebecca is. Of course her niece is dead. It’s
entirely shady that she never sees the girl and her stepmother has some
mysterious excuse for her constant absence. So the story is short without many
surprises, but nevertheless leaves you chilled as you learn the truth of the
dead little girl (unless you’re a sociopath and don’t care about the health of
little girls). The story is too short to be boring, but doesn't do a lot in the suspense or surprise department.
Mary Eleanor Wilkins-Freeman (aside from having a long name) has a reputation for mother-daughter stories. In many of her works, like “The Lost Ghost” there is a child who has died due to neglect. We see that woman theme this genre is so fond of; women belong in the sphere of domesticity and when they fail at this, abnormal things happen.
Mary Eleanor Wilkins-Freeman (aside from having a long name) has a reputation for mother-daughter stories. In many of her works, like “The Lost Ghost” there is a child who has died due to neglect. We see that woman theme this genre is so fond of; women belong in the sphere of domesticity and when they fail at this, abnormal things happen.
So in summation, women, don’t
have a career—your job is suckling babies and anything less will get you
eternally haunted (good to know Casey Anthony has it coming).
This story is recommended.
Bring me... a shrubbery.
This story was a nice little read. I agree too that it just did not possess enough to merit any real deep discussion about it. I feel that it played too much with some common cliches about women and offered no real astonishment at the end.
ReplyDelete